Small Employer Retirement Plan Credits (Sections 45E and 45T)

By Timothy LeGendre, CPA · Florida License #AC62625 · Published 2026-08-31

How the section 45E startup-cost and contribution credits and the section 45T auto-enrollment credit work, and which ones reach a one-participant plan.

How it works

Congress uses tax credits, not deductions, to get a small employer to start a retirement plan. Three credits live on Form 8881, flowing through the general business credit under Section 38. Section 45E(a) is the startup-cost credit: half the ordinary and necessary cost of setting up and administering a new plan, rising to the full amount for the smallest employers, capped, and running three years. Section 45E(f), added by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, separately credits the employer's own contributions to that new plan, capped per employee and phasing down over five years. Section 45T is the auto-enrollment credit: a flat $500 a year, for three years, for building an eligible automatic contribution arrangement into any qualified plan, new or existing.

A credit is worth more than a deduction of the same size: it reduces the tax bill dollar for dollar rather than at the marginal rate. Section 45E is not free money stacked on a full deduction, though. The Code forces a dollar-for-dollar reduction of the deduction for the same costs and contributions, so the real value is the gap between the credit and the displaced deduction's tax value, not the credit's face amount. Section 45T is different: nothing ties the auto-enrollment credit to a specific deductible cost, so there is no deduction to give up for it.

What this is worth in Florida

Every dollar of this is federal. Florida has no individual income tax and does not tax pass-through income at the personal level, so there is no state credit sitting on top of the federal one, no state deduction to protect, and no state add-back to compute. The entire analysis for a Florida employer runs through Form 8881 and Form 3800 alone.

Who this applies to

All three credits start from the same headcount test, and two of the three narrow sharply from there.

  • The shared threshold. No more than 100 employees who received at least $5,000 of compensation from the employer in the year before the plan's first credit year, with every controlled-group, common-control, and affiliated-service-group member combined under Sections 52 and 414(m) and treated as one employer, counting every employee who clears $5,000, highly compensated or not.
  • The three-year successor-plan lookback, for two of the three credits. For the startup-cost and employer-contribution credits only, the employer, or any controlled-group member or predecessor, must not have established or maintained a qualified plan covering substantially the same employees at any point in the three tax years before the new plan's first credit year. A genuinely new plan is the easy case; replacing one terminated inside that window is not, for these two credits. Auto-enrollment carries no such lookback: a business that lost the other two this way can still earn the flat $500-a-year credit under Section 45T if it otherwise meets the headcount test.
  • The NHCE gate, for the startup-cost credit only. Qualified startup costs exclude any expense tied to a plan without at least one non-highly-compensated employee (NHCE) eligible to participate. That employee only has to be eligible, not enrolled or contributing, but a plan with zero non-owner employees produces no startup-cost credit no matter what is spent putting it in place.

Whether a working spouse changes the answer

Usually it doesn't. Highly compensated status turns partly on being a five-percent owner under Section 414(q)(2), which defines that by reference to Section 416(i)(1). Section 416(i)(1) in turn applies the constructive-ownership rules of Section 318(a)(2)(C), substituting five percent for fifty percent. Separately, Section 318(a)(1) attributes a spouse's ownership to the individual as family attribution. A spouse who works for a business the other spouse owns more than five percent of is deemed a five-percent owner, and therefore highly compensated, regardless of that spouse's own pay. Putting a working spouse on the plan does not, by itself, create the NHCE participant the startup-cost credit needs; the classic owner-and-spouse one-participant 401(k) stays outside Section 45E(a) even after the spouse joins.

Auto-enrollment is the one credit in this family genuinely open to a one-participant plan: no NHCE requirement, no lookback, just the headcount test and an eligible automatic contribution arrangement.

The employer-contribution credit sits in between. Section 45E(f)'s eligible-plan definition excludes a defined benefit plan but does not carry forward the NHCE limitation attached to qualified startup costs; the Form 8881 instructions give it a separate definition that leaves that limitation out. Read on its own text, that opens the door to an owner-only plan's own contribution generating a credit, as long as the owner's wages stay under the year's wage-exclusion threshold. No Treasury regulation, revenue ruling, or IRS notice has confirmed that reading for a true one-participant plan, though, so I treat it as a documented, disclosed position, not an automatic entry.

What it requires

The dollar mechanics differ credit by credit, and getting the rate right matters as much as clearing eligibility.

Rates, caps, and credit periods

The startup-cost credit runs at 50 percent of qualified startup costs, rising to 100 percent for an employer that would still clear the headcount test at 50 employees instead of 100: 1 to 50 employees draws the full rate, 51 to 100 stays at half. The dollar cap for the year is the greater of $500, or the lesser of $250 times the number of eligible NHCEs, or $5,000, running for the first credit year and the two years after, three years total.

The employer-contribution credit counts a capped amount of the employer's per-employee contribution each year, multiplied by that year's applicable percentage, and the result cannot exceed $1,000 per employee. A third limit applies above 50 employees and is easy to miss because the startup-cost credit's own 51-to-100 band is described separately: under Section 45E(f)(2)(B) the contribution credit is reduced by 2 percentage points for each employee over 50 in the preceding year, which zeroes it out entirely at 100 employees. The Form 8881 instructions publish the resulting per-employee counting caps directly, stepping up as the percentage steps down:

Credit yearApplicable percentagePer-employee counting cap
Years 1 and 2100%$1,000
Year 375%$1,334
Year 450%$2,000
Year 525%$4,000
Year 6 and after0%none

The credit runs for the first tax year the plan is effective plus the next four years, five years total, then stops for good. It excludes elective deferrals, excludes any defined benefit or cash-balance plan, and excludes any contribution for an employee whose wages exceed the inflation-adjusted wage-exclusion amount: $105,000 for 2025, $110,000 for 2026.

The auto-enrollment credit is flat: $500 for the first year the plan includes an arrangement meeting Section 414(w)(3), covering the arrangement's default deferral percentage, default investment, and required participant notice, and $500 again for each of the next two years it is maintained, three years total.

The startup-cost credit lets an employer elect the tax year before the plan takes effect as the first credit year, claiming costs paid or incurred that year instead. The contribution credit's first tax year is defined only as the year the plan becomes effective; the statute does not carry that same prior-year election into it, and I do not assume it applies there without confirming it separately.

Claiming the startup-cost or contribution credit forces a matching reduction of the deduction it was computed from. Auto-enrollment carries no such reduction, since it is not tied to a specific deductible cost. All three sit inside the general business credit: unused amounts carry back one year and forward twenty, and all three flow to Form 3800, with no separate election needed unless the employer wants to opt out of Section 45E for a year.

What you need to document

Substantiation here is mostly about proving eligibility before the numbers are ever run, since the dollar amounts themselves come straight off invoices and payroll records.

The headcount count itself
The prior year's employee count at the $5,000 threshold, combined across every controlled-group, common-control, and affiliated-service-group member, dated to the year before the plan's first credit year. This supports both the 100-employee limit and the 50-employee line that sets the startup-cost credit's rate.
The NHCE-eligibility record for the startup-cost credit
Who the plan actually made eligible to participate, and the highly-compensated test run against each person, including spousal attribution. This is the single fact the startup-cost credit lives or dies on, and it has to be a plan-design record, not an after-the-fact assumption.
The automatic contribution arrangement's actual mechanics
The plan's default deferral percentage, default investment, and required participant notice, genuinely built into the document rather than added as an unused feature. For a one-participant plan this is what makes the arrangement real rather than a checkbox.
Contribution and wage records, by employee and year
Employer contributions kept separate from each employee's elective deferral, and each employee's wages checked against that year's wage-exclusion threshold before the contribution counts toward the credit.
The three-year lookback record, where it applies
Evidence no qualified plan covered substantially the same employees in the three years before the new plan's first credit year, for the startup-cost and contribution credits only. Auto-enrollment needs no such record.
The Form 8881 computation trail
The credit computation itself, including the matching deduction reduction the instructions require. Comparing Form 8881 to the deducted expense is the most direct way this gets checked.

Where it goes wrong

Most of what goes wrong here is arithmetic or a missed cross-reference, not an aggressive position. The statute is not shaky; the details are just dense.

The recurring mistakes

  • Forgetting the deduction reduction. The most mechanical, most-checked failure here: skipping the deduction reduction is a double benefit the IRS can catch by comparing Form 8881 to the deducted expense.
  • Overstating the small-employer rate. The 100 percent rate needs 50 or fewer total employees, not 50 or fewer NHCEs. Confirm against the whole headcount, not the narrower count used for the dollar cap.
  • Missing the controlled-group or affiliated-service-group aggregation. A single owner running two related businesses must combine headcounts and contributions across both; treating each entity as standalone overstates the credit.
  • Claiming the startup-cost credit for a plan with no eligible NHCE. The single most common failure mode for this client base: an owner-only or owner-and-spouse plan does not generate this credit, and adding the spouse does not change that.
  • Using a stale wage-exclusion figure. The contribution-credit threshold moves every year, from $105,000 for 2025 to $110,000 for 2026, off a base year the IRS itself corrected by notice after finding an apparent drafting error. Confirm the current year's number.
  • Running a defined benefit or cash-balance plan through the contribution credit. Section 45E(f) excludes it by name, though the startup-cost credit can still reach a defined benefit plan's setup costs if the NHCE gate is met.
  • Counting an elective deferral as an employer contribution. Only real employer money, nonelective or match, counts toward the contribution credit.
  • Assuming the three-year lookback kills all three credits. It only touches the startup-cost and contribution credits; restarting a plan for the same people does not disqualify it from the auto-enrollment credit.
  • Treating the owner-only contribution-credit position as routine. Absent direct IRS confirmation for a true one-participant plan, I document it as a reasoned, disclosed position, not a default entry.
  • Treating a one-participant automatic contribution arrangement as automatically bulletproof. Nothing in Section 414(w) or the Form 8881 instructions bars a single-participant plan from adopting one, but no published IRS guidance blesses the mechanics of auto-enrolling a plan's only participant, so I confirm the default-deferral and notice mechanics are genuinely built into the document, not a checkbox.

A situation where this comes up

The version I see most often is an owner-managed business with real non-owner staff on payroll long enough that the owner is finally ready to put a plan in place. Nothing about how the business runs has to change. What decides the outcome is plan design: whether the plan genuinely offers participation to an NHCE, whether it includes an automatic contribution arrangement from the start, and whether anyone in the ownership group sponsored a plan covering these same people in the past three years.

The version that concerns me is the one-participant business sold a plan on the promise of three credits stacked together, when the structure on offer produces at most one. An owner-only or owner-and-spouse S corporation gets nothing from the startup-cost credit regardless of the pitch, and its contribution-credit position is a judgment call to document, not claim outright. Its best case is the auto-enrollment credit, a flat $500 for three years, and even that rests on the statute's plain text rather than on settled ground: a genuine automatic-enrollment arrangement with exactly one participant is untested, with no published IRS guidance on how it is supposed to operate. An owner in that position, comparing plan types before any credit is on the table, is often having the same conversation as my solo 401(k) versus SEP-IRA comparison.

Either way, the credits are a reason to get the plan-design conversation right, not a reason to rush into a plan that would have made sense anyway. I would rather tell a client that a plan qualifies for one credit instead of three than have that conversation for the first time during an examination.

Please read: This page explains how a tax provision works in general terms. It is not advice about your situation, and reading it does not make you my client. Tax outcomes turn on facts I would need to review. Before acting on anything here, talk it through with your own CPA or attorney.

Ready to get started?

Tell me about your business. You'll leave the call knowing where you stand and what I'd do about it.

Book a Discovery Call

Pick a time on my calendar. No obligation.

Frequently asked questions

Can a one-person S corporation get the retirement plan startup-cost credit?
Generally no. Section 45E(d)(1)(B) requires at least one employee eligible to participate who is not highly compensated, and a true one-participant plan, owner only or owner plus a spouse, has no such employee. Adding a working spouse does not fix this if the owner holds more than five percent of the business: family-attribution rules deem that spouse a five-percent owner too, and therefore highly compensated, regardless of the spouse's own pay. The separate auto-enrollment credit under section 45T carries no such requirement and can still apply.
What is the difference between the section 45E and section 45T retirement plan credits?
They are three separate credits on the same form, not one credit with two names. Section 45E(a) credits half, or all, of the cost of setting up a new retirement plan, capped and running three years. Section 45E(f), added by the SECURE 2.0 Act, separately credits the employer's own contributions to that plan, through a declining per-employee cap over five years. Section 45T credits a flat $500 a year, for three years, for adding automatic enrollment to a plan, new or existing, and it is the only one of the three expressly open to a plan with a single participant.
Do I have to reduce my deduction if I claim the section 45E retirement plan credit?
Yes, for the startup-cost and employer-contribution credits. Section 45E forces a dollar-for-dollar reduction of the deduction for the same costs or contributions the credit is computed on, so the real value is the gap between the credit and the tax value of the deduction it displaces, not the credit's full face amount. The section 45T auto-enrollment credit is different: it is not tied to a specific deductible cost, so nothing about it reduces any deduction.
How many employees can a business have and still qualify for these retirement plan credits?
No more than 100 employees who each received at least $5,000 of compensation in the year before the plan's first credit year, counting every controlled-group, common-control, and affiliated-service-group member as one combined employer. The startup-cost credit's full 100 percent rate needs a smaller number still: 50 or fewer total employees on that same combined count, not 50 or fewer of the non-highly-compensated employees used for the dollar cap. Above 100 combined employees, none of the three credits apply.
Does restarting a terminated retirement plan reset these credits?
Not for two of the three. If the employer, or any related controlled-group member, established or maintained a qualified plan covering substantially the same employees at any point in the three tax years before the new plan's first credit year, the startup-cost and employer-contribution credits are unavailable regardless of how the new plan is otherwise designed. The auto-enrollment credit carries no such lookback: a business shut out of the other two by a recent plan can still earn the flat $500-a-year credit under section 45T if it otherwise meets the headcount test.
Can an owner-only business claim the section 45E contribution credit for its own retirement contribution?
It is a genuinely open question, not a settled yes. Section 45E(f)'s own definition of an eligible plan does not carry forward the non-highly-compensated-employee requirement that blocks the startup-cost credit, so a literal reading of the statute does not bar an owner-only plan's own contribution from generating a credit, as long as the owner's wages stay under the year's wage-exclusion threshold. No Treasury regulation, revenue ruling, or IRS notice has confirmed that reading for a true one-participant plan, so I treat it as a documented, disclosed position rather than an automatic entry.

Timothy LeGendre CPA LLC | Florida CPA License #AC62625 (firm #AD72267) | Mount Dora, FL | (407) 417-1064 | Contact